vaststage.blogg.se - Sugarsync vs spideroak

#Sugarsync vs spideroak software#

The user’s password is used to generate an encryption key that is also inaccessible to the company. In addition to automatically encrypting all data during both transfer and storage, SpiderOak vs DropBox has a no-password-storage policy that makes user data and even filenames inaccessible to employees.

Better security in a “zero-knowledge” environment.

SpiderOak can sync, backup and share files of all sizes. It’s not enough to accommodate many photo albums or graphic presentations. SpiderOak backup and sync functions work separate, eliminating extra overhead.ĭropbox limits files uploaded through its Web interface to 350 MB. Since Dropbox can only backup files by synchronizing them, files that only need to be backed up and not synchronized must still be replicated on every computer, consuming considerable amounts of additional storage.

A backup-without-sync option saving disk space as well as eliminating extraneous data movement.

It eliminates holes in the storage safety net. SpiderOak further retains all previous versions of files, plus files that have been deleted. With SpiderOak, a user can choose to backup any file including those that are not synchronized.

Complete backup protection, not just of synchronized files.ĭropBox backs up only the files contained in the dedicated Dropbox sync folder.SpiderOak Sync allows users to select groups of folders from all computers and external drives without modification of the folder structure.

#Sugarsync vs spideroak software#

Being compared to DropBox, the new version of SpiderOak offers:ĭropBox requires users to place items into a special folder that is then replicated on other devices where the software is installed.